On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Rene Pankratz <rene.pankratz.l...@iant.de> wrote: > Indeed polycom phones subscribe the list without an error. > But the problem still persists with snom phones. > > Maybe I should switch to sipx-dev and discuss if I should re-open the > ticket.
sipx-users is fine list to report on. The ticket was about polycom and avaya phones, not snom. I wonder if fixing them broke snom. I would open a new ticket and capture sip trace, ideally in 4.0 working system and 4.2 not working system, that would be helpful. I did try to compare sipXrls source code from 4.0 and 4.2 and I did not see anything obvious. Because this is a regression, I'd propose dev team looks into this for September and potentially backport fix for 4.2.1. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
