I think it's important to mention this on the wiki for the install
instructions and any discussions on NAT or networking on the wiki.
Otherwise, people who miss this little bit of news will be pulling
their hair out. What's the consensus on whether or not STUN is needed?
It seems to be needed at least if someone has dynamic DNS.Thanks, Tim Ingalls Shared Communications, Inc. 801-618-2102 Office Todd R. Hodgen wrote: -1 Having a default stun address to me seems important. If during setup you don't add one, and you don't have a static address on the router, you are going to have issues. Unless you do a test for it during diagnostics to ensure either an address is there or a stun server. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:52 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] All calls were failing... why? stun01.sipphone.com is gone... On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Matt White <[email protected]> wrote: |
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
