On 5/13/2011 9:08 AM, Josh M. Patten wrote: > Perhaps the glory days are over. Is SL6 binary compatible with RHEL6? If so > it might be in the sipXecs project's best interest to recommend new > installations use SL6. Just a thought. Just for fun, I tried installing with Scientific Linux. 6 was a no go. There were dependency issues that I could not easily resolve. I assume RHEL 6 would be the same. I tried it with 5.5, and it worked perfectly. It is up and running, and everything seems fine. See below. I didn't put it through much testing, but it looked about the same as RHEL and CentOS.
[root@SL55-test ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Scientific Linux SL release 5.5 (Boron) [root@SL55-test ~]# yum list installed |grep sipx sipx-openfire.noarch 3.6.4-3 installed sipxacccode.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxacd.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxbridge.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxcallcontroller.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxcalllib.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxcdrlog.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxcommons.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxcommserverlib.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxconfig.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxconfig-agent.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxconfig-ftp.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxconfig-mrtg.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxconfig-report.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxconfig-snmp.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxconfig-tftp.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxecs.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxfreeswitch.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipximbot.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxivr.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxmediaadapterlib.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxmedialib.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxopenfire.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxpage.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxpark.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxpbx.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxportlib.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxpresence.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxprovision.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxproxy.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxproxy-cdr.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxpublisher.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxrecording.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxregistry.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxrelay.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxrest.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxrls.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxsaa.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxsupervisor.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed sipxtacklib.x86_64 4.4.0-202.g15729 installed sipxtools.x86_64 4.4.0-192.ga8beb installed [root@SL55-test ~]# > Josh Patten > Brazos County Network Engineer > 979.361.4676 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin > (public/usenet) > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 9:03 AM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: [sipx-users] CentOS troubles??? > > http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2011/05/the-rise-and-fall-of-centos.html > > This was unfortunately an interesting read for me. CentOS has been our > corporate standard for years. I hope they resolve their issues, but the Dag > Wieers issue does not seem like a good sign. That repo has always been > reliable for me for packages. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
