I think it would be interesting to hear from tiptel what they don't like about that call scenario or configuration. On Jun 17, 2011 8:35 AM, "Henry Dogger" <h.dog...@telecats.nl> wrote: > Anyone? J > > > > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Henry > Dogger > Sent: donderdag 16 juni 2011 11:53 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: [sipx-users] difference in pickup from mediant gateway > > > > Hi all, > > > > Currently we are testing tiptel phones to see if they support the > features we would like to have, as an alternative to polycom. > > Perhaps someone already tested these phones and could provide some info > J > > > > The issue I see atm is when trying to pickup a call coming in on a > tiptel phone from a mediant gateway using call pickup (*78), this fails. > > Every other call pickup works properly.... > > I tried this as well with a call arriving on a polycom, and this works. > > > > I made two traces one from polycom and one from the tiptel phone (also > attached these) > > What I noticed as a difference is the "302 moved temporarily" message > from the registrar back to the proxy. > > When the call is arriving on the polycom it returns the 302 message with > a contact header: 534889935@172.30.70.50 (which is the correct ip of the > gateway) > > When the call is arriving on the tiptel however the 302 message contains > a contact header: 534889...@sipxecs.test.colos.telecats.nl (which is the > domain of my system) > > > > Is the phone causing this difference, or is it somewhere done in > sipXecs? > > I can only fix this issue to change the setting "Gateway Name" (in Proxy > and Registration tab of gateway) from domain to IP address... > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Henry Dogger > > Telecats BV > > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
