Patch #9 had some changes to the proxy, which is where this message is taking place. Your UA (bria) is the piece rejecting it in this case. Here is what I see from the log:
"2011-08-17T15:37:27.662037Z":127551:OUTGOING:INFO:ps0sipx01.webcti.local:SipRouter-15:41FFF940:SipXProxy:"SipUserAgent::sendTcp TCP SIP User Agent sent message:\n----Local Host:10.147.113.221---- Port: -1----\n----Remote Host:10.147.113.221---- Port: 5070----\nINVITE sip:46000@webcti.local;sipx-noroute=Voicemail;sipx-userforward=false;sipxbridge-moh=false SIP/2.0\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:10.147.113.221:5060;lr>\r\nRoute: <sip:rr.ps0sipx01.webcti.local;lr>\r\nCall-Id: b423d662dadd7c28ab004247913f0f92@10.147.113.221\r\nCseq: 118 INVITE\r\nFrom: <sip:46003@webcti.local>;tag=812573682\r\nTo: <sip:46000@webcti.local>\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.147.113.221;branch=z9hG4bK-XX-0a83iZMWMApw__BhWOc9dajdng\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.147.113.221:5180;branch=z9hG4bKdd3642eba352c96ef48e8db9f4ad6b21393933\r\nMax-Forwards: 20\r\nContact: <sip:10.147.113.221:5180;transport=udp;x-sipX-nonat>\r\nAllow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY\r\nContent-Type: application/sdp\r\nProxy-Authorization: Digest username=\"46000\",realm=\"webcti.local\",nonce=\"f630b991a83f62abb583530c6c1bc2904e4be037\",uri=\"sip:46000@webcti.local;sipx-noroute=Voicemail;sipx-userforward=false;sipxbridge-moh=false\",response=\"6f42967768110cb505ab451a7c549c76\",qop=auth,cnonce=\"xyz\",nc=00000001\r\nContent-Length: 195\r\nDate: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:37:27 GMT\r\nX-Sipx-Spiral: true\r\nP-Asserted-Identity: <sip:46003@webcti.local;signature=4E4BE037%3A508ce2910ac8fe1efb522e35f08a8981>\r\n\r\nv=0\r\no=- 978416123 978416123 IN IP4 10.147.113.221\r\ns=SipXconfig\r\nc=IN IP4 10.147.113.221\r\nt=0 0\r\nm=audio 2222 RTP/AVP 0 101\r\na=sendrecv\r\na=rtpmap:0 *PCMU/8000*\r\na=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000\r\n--------------------END--------------------" ONLY PCMU is being presented. So the question I have for you to ask the dev's is "was there a commit against the proxy which would have reverted click to call from offering both G711u and G711a to just G711u" in patch #9? I would not ask this question IF you manually adjusted something to make it offer both or to change your default to G711A. Rather, I suggest you go back and make that change. Lastly, if this is something that was manually altered, consider a JIRA so you do not have to continue to make these changes every time you update. I am pretty sure click-to-call only offers G711U by default, due to the education entity that contributed it at the time had no need for anything else. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Tony Graziano < tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > It actually worked before? I thought click-to-call wants to use G711u only? > I tried on my trunk with a polycom (also running patch #9) and it did work > without issue. Have you tried it with a different UA? > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:51 AM, cyril constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have analyzed sipXproxy.log traces, I can see error message "SDP: >> Incompatible media format: no common codec", well why not but my both users >> have G711 Alaw only authorized on, in Bria in enable codec there is also >> only G711Alaw selected for both users. >> >> Maybe I miss something. In attachment you have traces. >> >> Regards. >> >> Cyril >> >> >> 2011/8/17 Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> >> >>> can you grab a snippet of the proxy log to see what the invite looks like >>> and perhaps why it is being rejected or dropped >>> On Aug 17, 2011 10:18 AM, "cyril constantin" < >>> cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi Guys, >>> > >>> > I have upgrade sipxecs with the release of yesterday (update 9), since >>> it >>> > I'm not able to have click to call from phonebook working properly. >>> > >>> > When I click on a contact and push button "call", it call me correctly >>> (Bria >>> > softphone) but when I answer the call it's hangup directly the line >>> instead >>> > of calling the B-party. >>> > >>> > Does anyone have this problem? >>> > >>> > Best Regards. >>> > >>> > Cyril >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net > Fax: 434.465.6833 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://support.myitdepartment.net > > <http://support.myitdepartment.net>Blog: > http://blog.myitdepartment.net > > Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 > > Ask about our Internet faxservices! > > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://support.myitdepartment.net <http://support.myitdepartment.net>Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet faxservices!
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
