by the way it was good to hear from you dale.
and thanks. On Sep 14, 2011 3:36 PM, "Tony Graziano" <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > then this confirms why flowroute is such a problem for some. > On Sep 14, 2011 3:25 PM, "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dwor...@avaya.com> wrote: >>> From: Tony Graziano [tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] >>> >>> if I make a call to a carrier and send the invite and also send sdp, >>> is it proper for the carrier to send back aight reinvite with a new >>> sdp even though no session has actually been established? and then >>> turn around and tell me my offer is not acceptable after they send me >>> to reinvite? >> >> No, the carrier can't send a re-INVITE until it has responded to your >> INVITE. See RFC 3261 section 14: >> >> Note that a UAC MUST NOT initiate a new INVITE transaction within a >> dialog while another INVITE transaction is in progress in either >> direction. >> >> Dale >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
