There are existing wiki pages that might server some poor soul stuck
in a time machine, but I think the pages being used might actually
cause a disservice to others.

These would revolve around "how to configure gateway xyz" (which has
been out of manufacture and perhaps not tested since before the 3.8
release). And no mention of manfuacturer xyz on the list because noone
uses them. The mere mention of them assumes they function with sipx,
which I would say "nut-uh!'. I might also say the same thing about
some ITSP examples.

Within Atlassian is there an easy way to designate this? I think with
4.6 coiming centerstage, it is a good idea to at least make sure the
visitor knows some of this no longer pertains the the current
stable/supportable versions, etc.

Any thoughts?

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Linked-In Profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
Ask about our Internet Fax services!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net

Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net
Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to