There are existing wiki pages that might server some poor soul stuck in a time machine, but I think the pages being used might actually cause a disservice to others.
These would revolve around "how to configure gateway xyz" (which has been out of manufacture and perhaps not tested since before the 3.8 release). And no mention of manfuacturer xyz on the list because noone uses them. The mere mention of them assumes they function with sipx, which I would say "nut-uh!'. I might also say the same thing about some ITSP examples. Within Atlassian is there an easy way to designate this? I think with 4.6 coiming centerstage, it is a good idea to at least make sure the visitor knows some of this no longer pertains the the current stable/supportable versions, etc. Any thoughts? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/