> Would it be better to discuss the blf/rls standards available to see if > there is a more efficient standard for a wan environment and whether they > are functionally possible.
+1 for this. Maybe the blf/rls request can be merged/compressed at the server at each location and sent via wan in merged/compressed format and expanded afterwards at the second server. As far as I understand the specs from PolyCom the blf/rls request are something like p2p. I can't find something that works similar and uses a client/server approch. > Are there any realistic options that would allow blf to be [...] > a mediocre connection between servers. The alternative is to run > multiple, separate sipXecs systems - which works fine, but is less than > ideal. Even this solution is much better than the current way. Since we discovered that our problems are related to BLF we completely disabled BLF and this is somewhat worse if the BLF function is a top argument to use PolyCom phones with two sidecars ;) -- Claas Hilbrecht http://www.jucs-kramkiste.de _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
