Looks like we'll need changes in spec files for all libs. I've opened an internal report to keep track of this issue.
Is this an issue for you? On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Domenico Chierico < domenico.chier...@sip2ser.it> wrote: > that's perfect for us, but I'm seeing that in other packages the la lib is > in standard rpm not in devel.. > > ref to > sipXtackLib > sipXcommserverLib > > thanks > Domenico Chierico > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Tacalau <dtaca...@ezuce.com>wrote: > >> Hi Domenico, >> >> We'll modify the spec file to add the libsipXport.la only in the devel >> rpm for sipXecs-4.6 from release-4.6-updates branch. >> >> Regards, >> Daniel >> >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Domenico Chierico < >> domenico.chier...@sip2ser.it> wrote: >> >>> I'm just experiencing problem building rpm for sipXecs-4.6, seems that >>> sipXportLib spec file add libsipXport.la in both regular rpm and -develop >>> one. >>> >>> thanks >>> Domenico Chierico >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
