Hi all,

as it seems - after calling the sipxReInitialize you have to set all the 
config options as you do after sipxInitialize...

The problem was that the option to use the rport wasn't set - and so it 
caused this behaviour...

Another thing i encountered while watching the code...

In the SipProtocolServerBase Class - createClient function...

This function does return a SipClient instanz - as far as i can see it 
should return an existing instanz if it matches on remoteHost and 
remotePort and local IP...

There is a call to:
SipClient* client = getClient(hostAddress, hostPort, localIp);

This call should return an existing SipClient - but call does not return 
anything any time...

So it does always create a new clientSocket - and then a new SipClient 
Class and does return the new created class...

So, why does it not can reuse the already created class ?

Isn't this a waste of ressources ?

Can someone else please try this ?

regards,
Wolfgang


Bob Andreasen schrieb:
> Wolfgang,
>  
> I haven't seen this problem; however, I'm guessing that we aren't 
> shutting something down and/or we aren't restarting something 
> correctly (some static??).  I would make sure that all of our threads 
> are shutdown after unitialize.  ...  I'm guessing that we did not 
> shutdown the OsNatAgentTask?
>
>  
> On 8/9/06, *Wolfgang Pichler* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     its me again with the next problem...
>
>     To be able to deal with lost network connections i do have made the
>     following...
>
>     Check the network connection -> go into idle state if it fails ->
>     check
>     for a new network connection -> on new connection do call
>     sipxReInitialize
>
>     I think thats the best way at time to deal with lost connections (any
>     other thoughts ?)
>
>     The problem now is - the after the call to sipxReInitialize the
>     SipClient is unable to read incoming messages
>
>     The SipClient does hang in the call to: bytesRead =
>     message->read(clientSocket, readBufferSize, &buffer); (around line
>     SipClient.cpp:274)
>
>     I do have added a debugging message before this call, and after this
>     call, to get some details about the clientSocket - it just gives
>     me the
>     following which does seem to be pretty correct
>
>     before i call sipxReInitialize i will get the following:
>     "WP: SipClient::Attemp message->read. Local 10.0.1.184:1830
>     <http://10.0.1.184:1830>, Remote:
>     0.0.0.0:0 <http://0.0.0.0:0>. Socket Descriptor: 5248"
>     "WP: SipClient::message->read returned 543 bytes. Local
>     10.0.1.184:1830 <http://10.0.1.184:1830>,
>     Remote: 0.0.0.0:0 <http://0.0.0.0:0>"
>     and the ethereal trace does show me that the message was coming in on
>     port 1830
>
>     after i have called sipxReInitialize i will get the following
>     "WP: SipClient::Attemp message->read. Local 10.0.1.184:1854
>     <http://10.0.1.184:1854>, Remote:
>     0.0.0.0:0 <http://0.0.0.0:0>. Socket Descriptor: 5432"
>     here it hangs
>     and the ethereal trace does show me that the message was coming in on
>     port 1865 - not 1854 where the client is listening !!
>
>
>     Something else i have noticed is (i am using STUN)
>
>     before the ReInitialize - the STUN Request was done using the same
>     port
>     as the SipClient uses to read messages (which does seem to be pretty
>     clear - because you can use STUN as NAT keepalive)
>
>     after the ReInitialize - the STUN Request was done using port 1854
>     - the
>     Response was also to port 1854 - so STUN Success - the SipClient is
>     listening on 1854 - as expected - but the SipClient is sending out the
>     Message on Port 1865 - so the response comes to 1865 - but no
>     SipClient
>     is listening on 1865 !!!
>
>     Before i try to fix this on my own - i wanted to ask here if someone
>     does already seem to know where the problem is ?
>
>     regards,
>     Wolfgang
>     _______________________________________________
>     sipxtapi-dev mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
>     <http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/>
>
>

_______________________________________________
sipxtapi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/

Reply via email to