> In few words: it is too costly. E.g. VoiceAge is free for non-commercial > use under Windows as I know. But I did not go into details of licensing > costs here, so I may be wrong.
Alexander, VoiceAge actually has a Linux evaluation version of G.729 at this time. However, we're interested in knowing more about GIPS because it integrates well with sipx. Can you please tell me what path I should take if I'm interested in finding out more regarding GIPS costs? Thanks, Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Chemeris Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipxtapi-dev] MpMisc.UcbPool Hello, On 8/23/06, Paul Yago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand, and I hope that this is correct, that GIPS has a G.729 > codec implementation. If so, what would it take to leverage this codec > instead of going through VoiceAge or Intel? Can the indemnification be > done by sipro in this case? In few words: it is too costly. E.g. VoiceAge is free for non-commercial use under Windows as I know. But I did not go into details of licensing costs here, so I may be wrong. Regards, Alexander Chemeris _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/ _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
