Hello, On 12/11/06, Dale R. Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 19:38 +0300, Alexander Chemeris wrote: > > Is there any reason to use custom type names instead of ANSI C9x > > standartized (u)int*_t types? This types provided by most new compilers. > > I'd never heard of stdint.h. Can you point me to a good discussion of > what it's supposed to contain? (I can find quite a number of versions > of stdint.h, but I haven't found a definition of what it's expected to > contain.) Here is C99:TC2 (latest) version of Standard: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1124.pdf
<stdint.h> description could be found in chapter 7.18 <inttypes.h> description could be found in chapter 7.8 Note other fancy headers too ;) And there is little clause about its usage in C++: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1835.pdf -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
