On 7/17/07, Pedro Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From the Wiki page I get the impression that branches/sipXtapi is the > branch targeted by most active developers these days. But Jaro's > statement "Experimental sipXtapi is refactored, and I think should be > less buggy" makes me wonder.
Current "main" branch is branch/sipXtapi. It is the only official version now. Jaro created a fork to clean up sipXtapi (only sipXtapi iteslf, without underlying libraries), this is what is referenced as "experimental" branch, it is available from his page on sourceforge. Someday it may be merged with official sipXtapi, but will take some time. > So, for a brand new project (a prototype actually) that requires a SIP > library, which sipxtapi code branch shall I use? Use official sipXtapi branch or Jaro's "experimental" branch on your taste. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting http://www.SIPez.com tel: +1 (617) 273-4000 _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
