> First of all - please, use threads for your mails. Follow rule "One 
> discussion -
> one thread". That is all your last four mail should be chained in one thread.

ok, I will try. What basic requirement that threads did not interrupt?

> > Probably MprFromNet should notify the decoder when there is a switching
> > on new SSRC, for example to do decoder::initDecode() to pick up a new
> > stream.
> 
> Yes, this may be a good solution. Patch, implementing this is welcome.
> Though, I'm not sure how to do this cleanly. If someone will take this, I'll
> work on elaborating right way.

> As a quick solution, you may check for SSRC inside decoder itself, and
> reset stats if SSRC have changed. Publish your patch on this - it may be
> interesting for others, even if not included in svn.

Look the attached file, all is correct?
I have checked up, the sound does not interrupt.

> > But, after all the situation when within the limits of one call 
> > simultaneously
> > there will be some RTP-streams with different SSRC is quite admissible,
> > and on idea they should be processed and mix up correctly in one. Yes?
> 
> Yes, I think it is a correct way. I think we may implement something like this
> in next few month. However it is not definitely planned yet.

By the way, and external decoders, for example speex, support different SSRC in 
one stream?

--
Best regards, 
Alexey [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]

Attachment: decoders_ssrc.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
sipxtapi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/

Reply via email to