On 7/25/07, stipus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It isn't in sipxtapi branch yet, as I don't have time to > >write a unittest for it. > > I don't know what the exact problem is, but I don't understand why unitests > would be required to fix a bug introduced by a previous revision.
Unittests are requires to not break things again. They allow us to check that everything is working fine. If some feature do not have unittest we could not test it sutomatically and so could not be sure that will not be broken. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting http://www.SIPez.com tel: +1 (617) 273-4000 _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
