On 1 Feb 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
Ian
what is the hold on an independent external audit?
an audit to assess whether and to what extent W3C is meeting the
goals it sets?
this was apparently under-discussion at the time.
Hi Jonathan,
Still no plans for an external audit. (I don't think that's what Danny
was referring to; I understood Danny's comments to be about site QA.)
_ Ian
regards
Jonathan
). But
given the W3C's key role in producing the relevant specs and
guidelines, there's a good case for saying its own pages should be
subject to far higher standards of quality control than any other on
the Web. Best practices, leading by example and all that.
A good way for dealing with this would be for the W3C to instigate
an
independent review,
Hi Danny,
I appreciate any offer of tools to help us maintain pages that
people use, and where the tool ends up lowering our costs.
This list is one way people raise awareness about page problems,
and I read the list and fix the ones that we are maintaining and
can be fixed.
_ Ian
--
Ian Jacobs ([email protected]) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 718 260 9447
