On 10 May 2012 05:07, Ian Jacobs wrote: > On 9 May 2012, at 6:15 AM, Florent Georges wrote:
Hi Ian, > Good catch! I have updated the requirements to include the > appropriate boilerplate for final specs. Thanks! >> Looks to me like they could be merged (adapting CLA/FSA): >> [...] > I don't object if they are merged, but I don't think I would > recommend it. I just found it weird to have two sentences following each other both saying "this doc is published by XXX CG", but I am certainly not a legal text / English expert ;-) Works for me! Thanks for your support! Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
