Hi Mark, Thanks for the feedback. I recall adding a bunch of anchors to the CG process: http://www.w3.org/community/about/
I'll take your advice and go add some for the cg legal agreements. Ian On 17 May 2012, at 4:05 PM, Vickers, Mark wrote: > In discussions with W3C legal staff and member legal staff about W3C > agreements, a nice feature of some W3C agreements is that we can pass a link > to a specific section of those agreements, e.g. > > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion-resign > > However, the availability of internal links in W3C agreements seems to be > very inconsistent, in three categories: > > 1.. Visible links: The best agreements have a Table of Contents and clickable > links in sections: > > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion-resign > > 2. Hidden links: Other agreements have no visible links, but the underlying > document has id attributes which can be used for linking, but only by the > technically savvy: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/12/Member-Agreement#terms > > 3. No links: Some agreements have no internal links at all: > > http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/ > > It's disappointing that the more recent agreement for CGs is the least > linkable! > > It would be great if all W3C agreements were republished consistently, with > visible links to each numbered section. > > Note that this is not the highest-priority request. > > Thanks, > mav > > > > -- Ian Jacobs ([email protected]) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
