On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Finally, I recently was updating my profile and added an affiliation.
>>> When I added the affiliation, I did not realize that it would remove
>>> my group memberships or have any legal effect because the interface to
>>> enact that change did not mention these side effects. I've since
>>> reverted my affiliation because it is not an IP-relevant fact and I am
>>> not an official representative of my university in any capacity. I'd
>>> like to recommend that the side effects of affiliation change be made
>>> clear in the user interface for changing that data.
>>
>> Good idea; will do. Thanks again!
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> I checked the form for changing one's affiliation and it says:
>
>  "Changing <name> affiliation would terminate by default his/her 
> participation in the following groups, until (s)he re-applies or gets 
> nominated under the new affiliation."

I've looked again at
<https://www.w3.org/users/{userid}/edit/affiliations> and it says "By
selecting an affiliation other than "None", you will be removed from
the following groups:". Either this wasn't there before or (more
likely) I was clicking through too fast to notice it.

> We are certainly trying to provide the sort of warning that you are looking 
> for. I have no problem changing the text to make it clearer. Would this be an 
> improvement?

Maybe 32pt blinking red? :-P

>  "Account affiliation plays an important role within W3C because of the 
> patent policies that govern participation. When you change your affiliation, 
> you will be removed from the following groups. Continued participation after 
> a change depends on the nature of your new affiliation. For example, if you 
> work for a Member organization, your Advisory Committee Representative will 
> need to nominate you."
>
> Any other suggestions?

I think it's probably fine as is and I was just in a hurry and not
reading carefully enough.

Thanks for your attention,

David


Reply via email to