Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am in the process, as you may have noticed, of moving the james files to
our own download structure.  If you look at the page I setup for
downloading, http://james.apache.org/download.cgi, you'll note that we point
people directly at files to download, or at a directory if we so choose.
The page does not work right now because the directories it references don't
exist, yet.  The question I have is whether it should be directly under
dist/james, or if it should be under something like dist/james/server.

I vote for dist/james for now. Easy enough to change, and seems like that would handle our needs.


--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >>> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to