Danny Angus wrote: > a) we go for even more web-site bloat, and risk discrepancies between > docs and users' versions by having three versions of docs, namely > 1 current HEAD > 2 current stable > 3 previous stable
I'd go for this one. At least the first two. > b) we bundle the docs using up everyones bandwidth, mirrors' storage > and have to solve the build problem of versions, repositories and > diretory structures. Worst case, I suppose that we can reference the docs online via SVN, e.g., http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/site/trunk/www/index.html, particularly if we fix all of the intra-project URLs to be relative. --- Noel
