On 08/12/08 09:16, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12 Aug 2008, at 5:22 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > >> On 08/12/08 01:55, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Could someone test synctex in both directions with the current >>> source? >> >> TextMate->Skim works, although lines might be off-by-one. > > This may be due to the offset of the line number (0-based or 1-based). > Though Skim is making the same assumptions as every other pdfsync > implementation I have seen (TeXniscope, PDFView, iTeXMac, iTeXMac2, > TeXShop, auctex).
Quite possible. TextMate's line numbers in the gutter start from 1, so presumably that's what gets passed to Skim. > About the abstract, what is the source file supposed to be? Is it > a .tex file? Yes. The entire manuscript is actually in a single .tex file to meet AGU requirements. I'll see if I can reproduce it with a simpler case, since posting this isn't an option. -- Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Skim-app-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
