> On 19 Mar 2017, at 18:31, Misha Velthuis <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks a lot for the quick response! Both solutions work great. 
> 
> Why are you saying that your script is safer? Is it because if provides more 
> output, and thus more info when something goes wrong?
> 
> Thanks again for sharing all of this. It's making my day!
> 
> Misha
> 

Because it does some more sanity checks, and also has some extra options.

Christiaan

> 
> On 19 Mar 2017, at 11:55, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> On 19 Mar 2017, at 11:29, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 19 Mar 2017, at 03:03, Misha Velthuis <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all, 
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure if this is the right way to ask this, but I have a question about 
>>>> the skimnotes tool (http://sourceforge.net/p/skim-app/wiki/SkimNotes_Tool/ 
>>>> <http://sourceforge.net/p/skim-app/wiki/SkimNotes_Tool/>).
>>>> 
>>>> I have a relatively large database of .skim notes that I would like to 
>>>> convert into .txt or .rtf documents (so that DocFetcher 
>>>> <http://docfetcher.sourceforge.net/en/index.html> can find them). 
>>>> 
>>>> Today I found out about the skimnotes tool and it works great, the only 
>>>> problem is that it only seems to work on single files. 
>>>> 
>>>> When there is only one .pdf file in the active directory (Mac terminal), 
>>>> and I run the command: "./skimnotes get -format rtf example.pdf", or when 
>>>> I run "./skimnotes get -format rtf *.pdf" I get an .rtf file with the 
>>>> notes of that pdf in the same directory. This works perfectly fine.
>>>> 
>>>> But when I have two pdf's or more in that directory, and I run the command 
>>>> "./skimnotes get -format rtf *.pdf" or "./skimnotes get -format rtf $(find 
>>>> *.pdf)" I do not get any .rtf file, and instead, one of the pdf's is 
>>>> greatly reduced in size and has become un-openable.
>>>> 
>>>> Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug in the tool?
>>>> 
>>>> Is there any easy way to convert a large number of .skim notes into .rtf 
>>>> or .txt files? Am I on the right track?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks a lot in advance! And thanks for working on this great software!
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Misha
>>> 
>>> The skimnotes tool works on single files only. A second file is interpreted 
>>> as the output file (run skimnotes help), so it won’t be a PDF file (even if 
>>> you give it a PDF extension).
>>> 
>>> So you should run the skimnotes tool in a loop instead, for instance by 
>>> using it in the command passed in a find command. There are two scripts 
>>> running skimnotes on a list of files on the Wiki. Though they run slightly 
>>> different commands from what you want, you could easily adapt them. The 
>>> skimbulk script should come closest to what you want (it gets notes in 
>>> .skim format rather than .txt or .rtf). 
>>> 
>>> Christiaan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> BTW, here is a quick and dirty way to do it (skimbulk essentially does 
>> something like this, but neater and safer)
>> 
>> find DIR -type f -name "*.pdf" -exec 
>> /Applications/Skim.app/Contents/SharedSupport/skimnotes get -format rtf "{}" 
>> ";"
>> 
>> Christiaan
>> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Skim-app-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users

Reply via email to