On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:45:52PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > perhaps this concept of the pool needs some or all of the following to > avoid future SPOFs:
Absolutely, although I think we should postpone discussion until Kristian can take part in it. > 0) hardware redundancy for the authoritative nameservers for > sks-keyservers.net <snip> > Kristian, i would happily offer zimmermann.mayfirst.org as a redundant > authoritative DNS server -- we'd just need to coordinate how the pool > gets published. I suggest DNS slaves would be the simplest way to achieve this. I'm happy to offer a London slave. If the master server sends notifies and the slaves do a XFER, pool updates can be run with almost no delay for clients. > Thanks for all your work keeping this service going! hopefully we can > spread some of the responsibility around :) Absolutely; thanks for all your work, and sorry to hear about the hardware trouble. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
