On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:33:14 -0700, Scott Grayban <sgray...@gmail.com> wrote: > The current key saving method is bulky and just so you guys can get a > idea on growth last year the dump was 3GB - as of today the dump is over > 4GB so that is at least a 1GB increase -- so if that is a sign of usage > in 5 to 10 years of growth the DB will become unmanageable -- in fact 1 > step to get into the pool is not going to work that well --> import a > current dump of the DB.
Our differences of opinion seem to be here: 1. You presume bandwidth and storage media will not keep pace over five to ten years. I disagree. 2. You believe that if storage media do not keep pace, it will be impractical to break backups across multiple media. I disagree. 3. You believe that it is somehow wasteful to keep old keys around, and/or there is no good cause to keep them around. I disagree. 4. You believe these preceding points constitute an urgent problem needing immediate attention. I disagree. I don't see there to be anything further to talk about. You are certainly entitled to your views: you're just not entitled to have me take them seriously. _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
