On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, 15:35 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: > John Clizbe wrote: > > Samir Nassar wrote: > > Then what should the DOCTYPE be? Otherwise, you're just complaining without > > offering anything to help the people who beat on the code to fix your > > problem. > > > > Would including: > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> > > > > before <head> solve your problem? > > > I waited a week and have heard nothing. So I took the SysAdmin's Fiat > Prerogative and made the above changes on my own. The change may be tested at > > http://keyserver.gingerbear.net:21371/ which is a backup/devel box.
Thanks John. I've had a bit of a poke at your dev server and it looks like you've taken the bull by the horns and are gradually working through upgrading the HTML markup to XHTML. No mean feat I'm sure! The HTML being emitted from SKS 1.1.1 seems to validate as HTML 3.2, so a quicker resolution may be simply to escape the ampersands in generated hyperlinks (&) and head each page with a 3.2 DTD header. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> Of course, if you have the time to work through and get all of the generated HTML validating as XHTML 1.0 that would be great. As long as each generated HTML document begins with a DTD, and the document conforms to that, I think the we can declare we've fixed the problem. -- John Marshall
pgpSi5nev7RFd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
