On May 18, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > I have started pondering on policy regarding a possible fork and its > criteria for inclusion in the main pool of sks-keyservers.net >
Do these questions need explicit answers? Even if an answer for how to handle version forks were specified, is there any reason to believe that anyone on a "fork" is going to comply with the specification? And wouldn't patience to see whether there actually is a SKS fork, with a need to specify forked version pool acceptance criteria, perhaps with administrative delegation to inter-continental and inter-national naming authorities, registered/distributed through DNS, with creepy-toe certificate compliance, and more … wouldn't a bit of patience be more prudent than this continued stoopid thread? Survival of the fittest … forks usually suffer the same fate as genetic mutations. 73 de Keff _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
