On 5/31/12 11:58 AM, John Clizbe wrote: > Other than the name being somewhat offensive in some English speaking > countries?
I'm going to chime in here on the side of the "git isn't necessary" crowd. Git is a fine RCS for large distributed projects. For the Linux kernel it's almost ideal. But SKS is not a large distributed project: it's a fairly small one, is unlikely to grow into a huge one, and I'm not sure it's worth the additional complexity over other simpler RCSes. Feel free to emphatically disagree, of course. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
