On 02/27/2013 12:36 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > Are the ServerAliases strictly necessary for a port binding to 11371? > Presumably you're not using canonical names to determine the service. > If the aliases really are necessary, keep in mind that some pools are > using a CNAME to pool.sks-keyservers.net, in particular keys.gnupg.net.
I think apache will land on this stanza as the default vhost stanza
based on the port, as long as no other vhost stanzas are set up for the
IP+port combination.
so i think that the ServerAlias isn't strictly necessary, though it can
be nice to include it if you are in the habit of grepping for likely
hostnames in your apache configs.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
