On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 18:09 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Did anyone on this list expect the keyserver network to > propagate non-exportable certifications? Nah,... not really, IMHO it should be considered a bug, and ideally such existing signatures should be removed if possible.
And I guess the intention of the RFC is rather clear (with or without MUSTs)... implementations should not export such signatures... and SKS counts IMO as an "implementation". Cheers, Chris. _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
