following up from a rather old thread... On Thu 2015-04-30 14:52:48 -0400, Tobias Mueller wrote: > On Fr, 2015-04-10 at 17:18 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I consider this a bug in SKS, if it can overconsume RAM on the basis >> of one misbehaving or rejecting peer. >> >> the implication is that a network attacker can force any SKS server >> into this state. >> >> Have you filed a bug report about this? > Has this been done? > Where is the bug tracker, anyway?
I've just filed this as a report here: https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks-keyserver/issues/39/misbehaving-peer-or-network-can-cause-out Regards, --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
