following up from a rather old thread...

On Thu 2015-04-30 14:52:48 -0400, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Fr, 2015-04-10 at 17:18 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I consider this a bug in SKS, if it can overconsume RAM on the basis
>> of one misbehaving or rejecting peer.
>> 
>> the implication is that a network attacker can force any SKS server
>> into this state.
>> 
>> Have you filed a bug report about this?
> Has this been done?
> Where is the bug tracker, anyway?

I've just filed this as a report here:

  
https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks-keyserver/issues/39/misbehaving-peer-or-network-can-cause-out

Regards,

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

Reply via email to