> On 4 May 2018, at 22:56, Arnold <sk...@mallos.nl> wrote: > > If keyserver A has configured Set A and keyserver B has configured Set B, the > set > reconciliation algorithm between keyservers A and B should only consider Set > C, > where Set C is the intersection of sets A and B. The set reconciliation > algorithm > can be used the same
The main difference between this proposal and the one that Phil, myself and others are discussing in the other thread is that here the servers need to agree on the definition of these sets in advance, and servers that do not understand the sets (perhaps because they are too old) will be unable to recon with those that serve a restricted set. The advantage of fake recon is that a) it can be deployed incrementally while maintaining recon between old and new software versions and b) there is no need for a commonly agreed definition of sets. A _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
