I don't think "resilient" can be used any more in relation to sks-keyservers as they drop offline on and off and even one malicious individual could take the whole network down if motivated enough.
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:34:49 +0000 Andrew Gallagher <andr...@andrewg.com> wrote: > > > On 6 Nov 2018, at 16:57, Volker Birk <v...@pep-project.org> wrote: > > > > I'm not of the opinion that key servers are a good idea at all. It's > > a pity that people still follow this wrong idea. > > There are other methods for discovery that don’t suffer from the same > weaknesses, but there is no equally resilient method of distributing > revocations. > > A > > _______________________________________________ > Sks-devel mailing list > Sks-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel -- me <st...@yakamo.org> _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
