Hi On 04/02/2019 11:35, Jason John Schwarz wrote: > I pushed my command_timeout up to 180 seconds per Kim's recommendation, but > that seems to cause the web interface to be very sluggish > during the period of key loads. I assume that is because the single thread > is busy. Any thoughts the trade off of the web interface being slow > randomly versus the SigAlarm on performance? > > Jason John Schwarz > eMail: ja...@insect.com
I've pushed mine to 600. Yes, I agree, there is a trade off but as long as you have some caching layer(s) in front things are a bit more reliable. I'm actually planning to write a blog article and dump all my findings so far regarding operating a SKS cluster. Regards, Martin Dobrev > > > _______________________________________________ > Sks-devel mailing list > Sks-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
