> On Feb 17, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Michiel van Baak <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 10:51:58AM -0800, Todd Fleisher wrote: >> I see. The resolver I used only showed me your IPV4 addresses. Perhaps a >> more seasoned list member can advise if this will work properly as I’ve not >> yet come across such a setup. I believe the gossip protocol uses the >> hostname value provided on the stats page and am unsure how (or if) it would >> work to have the gossip using a different hostname/IP. > > Ok, if that's the case ... > I have peered with three others now, and I see updates flowing in and > out.
If it’s working for you it might be fine and I’m just missing or misunderstanding something. > Please let me know if my setup is causing problems. I’ll have defer to the more seasoned and/or knowledgeable members of the list about this. -T > -- > Michiel van Baak > [email protected] > GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6FFC75A2679ED069 > > NB: I have a new GPG key. Old one revoked and revoked key updated on > keyservers.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
