On 3/22/19 9:44 PM, brent s. wrote:
(SNIP)
> As you can see, the binary format is approximately 70% the size on-disk
> of the ASCII-armored version. This scales pretty well; generally
> speaking, the binary format of any given signature, including signatures
> or not, regardless of hash type or key size, will be roughly 70% the
> size of the ASCII-armored equivalent data.
(SNIP)
SIGH.


"the binary format of any given signature, including signatures or not,
regardless of hash type or key size,"

should read:


"the binary format of any given *exported key*, including signatures or
not, regardless of hash type or key size,"

-- 
brent saner
https://square-r00t.net/
GPG info: https://square-r00t.net/gpg-info

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

Reply via email to