On 3/22/19 9:44 PM, brent s. wrote: (SNIP) > As you can see, the binary format is approximately 70% the size on-disk > of the ASCII-armored version. This scales pretty well; generally > speaking, the binary format of any given signature, including signatures > or not, regardless of hash type or key size, will be roughly 70% the > size of the ASCII-armored equivalent data. (SNIP) SIGH.
"the binary format of any given signature, including signatures or not, regardless of hash type or key size," should read: "the binary format of any given *exported key*, including signatures or not, regardless of hash type or key size," -- brent saner https://square-r00t.net/ GPG info: https://square-r00t.net/gpg-info
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel