> On 16 Aug 2019, at 20:31, Stefan Claas <s...@300baud.de> wrote: > > You guys need a lot of brainstorming IMHO on how to improve the SKS > infrastructure to get back users.
I dunno, I’ve been brainstorming pretty hard on this list recently... :-p > Maybe it would be a good idea to > get the hockeypuck author on board, because it is written in Golang > and I assume that there are more Golang programmers available to help > you guys out, compared to OCaml programmers. The issue is less about the programming (or the programming language) and more about the protocol. If we had agreement on a replacement protocol then anyone reasonably competent could program it. I know of three SKS *protocol* implementations in the wild. Any or all of these could be upgraded to the new protocol - IFF we had a) broad agreement on what the new protocol was *for*, and b) a robust specification. A _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
