Andrew Gallagher wrote: > > > On 16 Aug 2019, at 19:48, Stefan Claas <s...@300baud.de> wrote: > > > > People, like me, do not > > like the idea of sharing dumps to 3rd parties (hello GDPR), without our > > consent. > > There is no net difference between distributing a dump and peering with > another sks server. I don’t understand why you keep going on about dumps and > not peering. They are the same thing from a data protection POV.
O.k. I understand your point, but what I like to say is that I or anybody else can download a dump without running a key server. While running a key server requires a dump, it would be really nice if dumps are only available to a (trusted) pool of operators, as long as the current SKS model is still available on the Internet. Regards Stefan -- box: 4a64758de9e8ceded2c481ee526440687fe2f3a828e3a813f87753ad30847b56 GPG: C93E252DFB3B4DB7EAEB846AD8D464B35E12AB77 (avail. on Hagrid, WKD) _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel