Oops. Thanks for the update. -T
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Jason John Schwarz <ja...@insect.com> wrote: > > The CVE issue is a hiccup in the page...if a server is offline it becomes > true. I noticed that when I was doing some maintenance on my server one day. > > Jason John Schwarz > > > > >> On Sep 10, 2020, at 8:18 PM, Todd Fleisher <t...@fleetstreetops.com >> <mailto:t...@fleetstreetops.com>> wrote: >> >> Good eye, I hadn’t noticed that one. The meta page also reports it is >> Vulnerable to CVE-2014-3207. While I think that alone will preclude it from >> being put into the pools even if it does resurface, I’d advise operators to >> remove the server from their membership files until that and the other >> issues are addressed/verified. >> >> https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ks-status.php?server=keyserver.newideatest.site >> >> <https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ks-status.php?server=keyserver.newideatest.site> >> -T >> >>> On Sep 10, 2020, at 3:39 PM, Jason John Schwarz <ja...@insect.com >>> <mailto:ja...@insect.com>> wrote: >>> >>> It must have come up at least once and reported because it is showing up on >>> the SKS server list >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
