Robby Workman wrote: > Murat D. Kadirov wrote: > > 11:15 Fri 08 Aug , Jim Diamond написал: > >> P.S. For everyone who makes slack packages... Maybe this has been > >> hashed out 100 times and you don't do it for some good reason, but if > >> not, would you consider using "-j 4" or something like than on your > >> "make" commands? Even on a single core, single CPU machine this helps > >> noticeably, and on a multi-core machine it makes a big difference. > > > > Not all programs, not on all machines (processors?) compile properly with > > "-j X". > > Indeed. > > It's still a sane default IMHO, and in those cases where we find > something doesn't compile with parallel make jobs, we can do something > like this instead: > > make || MAKEFLAGS="" make -j1 >
so $JOBS is now obsoloted by that one and new packages should use this instead? Grs, Heinz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
