Steve wrote: > Is there a downside to using a jack-audio built without libcap support with > respect to Rosegarden and Ardour for example. If so, should the jack-audio > buildscript be returned to its original state?
No, there is no downside of using a jack built without libcap. I wasn't sure myself and talked to one of jack's devs and he made clear that one *should not* use libcap with jack, except when they are running a 2.4 series kernel. The change in the SlackBuild of jack was therefore not to avoid the problem mentioned in this thread, but a bugfix. It will not be returned to its original state. I might rethink this when jack supports libcap also on 2.6 kernels. Grs, Heinz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
