On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:12:13 +1100 Peter Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2009-12-16, Mikko Varri <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > Is it OK to rename a package for consistency? > > > > I'm thinking of renaming X11-haskell to haskell-X11, similar to rest > > of the haskell libraries (or, in fact, similar to rest of the > > language binding type of packages). > > > I only now realised there was another Haskell library in SBo :) > > Anyway, I made my scripts install into the default locations, > producing /usr/$lib/$pkg/$ghc. X11-haskell > produces /usr/$lib/$ghc/$pkg/$ghc (double $ghc). > > Perhaps we should standardise on /usr/$lib/$ghc/$pkg ? My only > concern is that the defaults might have been chosen for a reason; > otherwise this line works: > > runhaskell Setup.lhs configure \ > --prefix=/usr \ > --libdir=/usr/lib$LIBDIRSUFFIX \ > --libsubdir=ghc-$GHC_VERSION/$SRCNAM-$VERSION \ > --docdir=/usr/doc/$PRGNAM-$VERSION > > I won't update my scripts just for this change, though, as it makes no > functional difference. You Haskelly guys should talk about this (and it's fine to do that on this mailing list if you wish), and once you reach a consensus, we'll go with that. At that point, just resubmit anything that needs to change (with pertinent notes in the "Comments" field of the submission form). -RW
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
