--- On Tue, 11/30/10, King Beowulf <kingbeow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think simple is better. Name,
> project site, lang/arch, brief
> description would be enough. Anyone interested in picking
> up the
> maintainership can go look up deps and more (and should
> anyway since
> projects can change). Some of the info will be in old
> slackbuilds for
> the previous slackware versions as well.

I lean towards what you are saying.  Why not just have people send in their 
requests w/

Name
Homepage
Brief description

Any extra could be under the description field and would just be gravy.

It might be useful to know how *many* people or are requesting certain 
SlackBuilds.

--phillip


      
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Reply via email to