On 2011-03-14 (Mon) 23:03:34 [-0500], Robby Workman wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:49:08 -0400 > Eric Pratt <eric.b.pr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:55 PM, slakmagik <slakma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > If there's anything you can do *without* sbopkg that you can't do > > > *with* sbopkg, it's at least theoretically a bug. > > > > > > > I knew it was a bug when I couldn't make a pot pie with sbopkg. I > > just KNEW it! > > > While we're fixing these egregious oversights, someone should figure > out how to make it bring me a beer. ;-) >
Oops :) - scope error. I mean "anything related to building SBo packages". Though, actually, then it should still probably bring pot pies and beer. ;) Oh, and to Ben, I have a question - I was originally thinking about abstract consistency for per app settings but is there a use case where you'd *want* to set the BUILD of all packages to the same number or the TAG of a set of packages to different values? While not the most consistent (but, after all, they're doing different things), # sbopkg -i foo:BUILD=build # per app # TAG=tag sbopkg -i foo # all apps should cover most needs. _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/