On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 11:38:14PM +0700, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> > BTW, other python3-based module scripts, would be better inegrated into
> > their python2-based scripts? for easier management. e.g. there is still
> > python3-itsdangerous.
> > 
> > Also, there are quite a lot python-module scripts based in Libraries
> > category, rather than Python category. What's the reason for such? Would
> > it be nice if sort them in one category to make life easy ? :P
> 
> If the maintainer (Dimitri) has no objections, that would be a good idea
> I cc him on this email
> 
> please note that python3-itsdangerous still being listed as a dependency
> for python3-Flask, so if it's being removed, python3-Flask need to be
> updated (again).
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> 

This is good. But what if asking the author of Flask SlackBuild to
support python3? so that I don't need to maintain python3-Flask. :P

cc Dimitris Zlatanidis

Many thanks






_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Reply via email to