On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 11:38:14PM +0700, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > > BTW, other python3-based module scripts, would be better inegrated into > > their python2-based scripts? for easier management. e.g. there is still > > python3-itsdangerous. > > > > Also, there are quite a lot python-module scripts based in Libraries > > category, rather than Python category. What's the reason for such? Would > > it be nice if sort them in one category to make life easy ? :P > > If the maintainer (Dimitri) has no objections, that would be a good idea > I cc him on this email > > please note that python3-itsdangerous still being listed as a dependency > for python3-Flask, so if it's being removed, python3-Flask need to be > updated (again). > > Thanks > > -- > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo >
This is good. But what if asking the author of Flask SlackBuild to support python3? so that I don't need to maintain python3-Flask. :P cc Dimitris Zlatanidis Many thanks _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/