No worries Nitish, The package has already been corrected by Willy and been pushed in the latest update. So as long as you update your local copy to what is now on the repo you will be fine for your next update.
Cheers Greg On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 11:47, Nitish Ragoomundun <lrugr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for your email. Indeed, I humbly used your script as an example > for the SlackBuilds script for netcdf-fortran. I have made a new submission > already to correct for my mistake. I am currently in contact with Dave from > SlackBuilds.org about the matter. > > I would like to second your request for a check by sbolint for such cases. > > Kind regards, > Nitish > > > On Sunday, September 25, 2022, Greg' Ar Tourter <artour...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> It looks like a copy of the netcdf.SlackBuild found its way into the >> netcdf-fortran package. I suspect the author used it as a starting point >> for their script and forgot to remove it from the submission. >> >> Maybe a check should be added to sbolint make sure only one .SlackBuild >> is present. >> >> Cheers >> >> Greg >> >
_______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
