Hi Isn't such an impressive optimization a real bugfix ?
Since 15.1 isn't even close, do you folks think an upgrade could be suggested to M. Volkerding for 15.0 ? Best regards Tonus Le 12 août 2024 17:55:42 GMT+02:00, Arkadiusz Drabczyk <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 09:12:33AM -0300, Jim wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 05:30 (-0400), B. Watson wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote: >> >> >> I ran it as root of course, it wouldn't work on /usr/man/man1 if I >> >> didn't since it is writable only by root. >> >> > I meant, are you sure when you timed it and got 10 seconds, that you >> > were actually using the -c option? I get pretty close to 10 seconds >> > when I time it *without* -c. If you really get "mandb -c" to run in >> > only 10 seconds, that's 60x as fast as it does for me, and I want to >> > know how (so I can make it run that fast for me, too). >> >> Just as another data point, on a laptop running S64-15.0 with a Ryzen 4700U >> and a Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 "disk", running >> time mandb -c >> I got >> mandb -c 253.46s user 397.39s system 134% cpu 8:02.15 total >> >> So yeah, 10 seconds would be pretty impressive. > >It must be due to >https://gitlab.com/man-db/man-db/-/blob/1e5462f3fd9bfd8cf496e32e23842018b67f9b91/NEWS.md#L233. > It >takes 10 seconds on -current with mandb 2.12.1 but it indeed took 6 >minutes on -stable in the VirtulBox with mandb 2.9.4. After I compiled >it from source it took 20 seconds on -stable too. > _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
