On 10/26/25 12:09, Christoph Willing wrote:
On 26/10/25 22:25, Antonio Leal via SlackBuilds-users wrote:
Qt6 could be better in SlackBuilds.
The fact is some packages just build with older/archived versions of
Qt6, others require recent ones and don't build with the former.
Then, within each Qt6 release, there are the extension&submodules,
for sure not all required for our current SlackBuilds apps.
SlackBuilds should not have just one "Qt6" but several, maybe
implementing just the minimum libs required, depending to the apps
requirements (at maintainer request)
Location should be something like, for example, /opt/Qt6.4.3 ...
/opt/Qt6.9.3 ..etc.
Take MuseScore: It is _validated_ against Qt6.9.1 and it needs
submodules qtbase, qt5compat, qtnetworkauth, qtscxml, qttools,
qtdeclarative and qtsvg, not the whole thing
I believe qt6 has no active maintainer at the moment. Are you
volunteering?
LinRs is the new maintiner of Qt6.
If so, remember that building a specialised version with minimum
extensions & modules that just suit one of your own pet projects means
that it may not be suitable for anything else. A big monster version
with everything possible included (like -current?) will be much more
useful to SBo users.
Agreed but why taking build time and disk space if it is not required?
chris
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives -https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ -https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
_______________________________________________
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
