_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
For every problem there is an answer that is easy, simple and wrong.
Nice is far too crude a tool for managing resource allocation issues
between competing CPU-bound processes... the automatic priority
juggling already in the UNIX or Linux kernel does a better job of
that than you can by manual intervention. But even if that was likely
to work here, I have learned the hard way that technical fixes to
social and political problems, and problems in a product offering or
business model, do not work worth a damn. This is not really a
technical issue, it's a matter of establishing a business case at LL
and so it's really outside the scope of this list.
- [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business practices Russell Haverty
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business practic... Thomas Grimshaw
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business pra... ordinal . malaprop
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business... Thomas Grimshaw
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business practic... Gordon Wendt
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business pra... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business pra... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business... Argent Stonecutter
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair busi... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair... Argent Stonecutter
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business... Tammy Nowotny
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair busi... Ian Betteridge
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair... Robin Cornelius
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business practic... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [sldev] Linden Lab and unfair business practic... David M Chess
