On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Opensource Obscure <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:19:23 -0500, Soft <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Alissa Sabre <[email protected]> >> wrote: > >>> BTW, I found some issues on trunk viewer. What is the expecte channel >>> to file a bug on svn trunk source? Should I submit the issue on >>> public JIRA as usual? >> >> Yup. For the version, you can specify "source code" - it wouldn't hurt >> to include 1.23 in addition. Until that's exported on its own, there's >> a fair chance that anything you see in trunk/ is destined for 1.23. > > Yesterday I filed two bugs against the render-pipeline branch: > http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-12555 > http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-12556 > > I just updated them so that they read now > > "render-pipeline branch" in the Title field, > "source code" in the Affects Version/s field and > "Second Life 1.23.0 (114978) Mar 21 2009 19:06:43 (Developer)" in the > Environment field. > > Is this ok?
Great! > By the way, in which Office Hour are discussions about realtime > shadows most welcome? I made a couple of videos using a > render-pipeline viewer where some glitches can be seen and I'd like > to discuss about them. I didn't report these ones into PJIRA yet. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5VCcO7NFpo > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cps7xYyEF7U You could add questions to the open source meeting agenda and note that here. Then we can see if one of the devs thinks it would be productive to attend, or if they could answer some things in advance. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
